I blogged some time ago about the rapid increase in the number of OpenStreetMap users and the volume of data in the OSM database, and its recent expansion as a result of adding the Canadian GeoBase datasets.
I just came across a comparison of OpenSteetMap and Google/Teleatlas prepared by Steve Chilton of Middlesex University using work begun by Bernard Zwischenbrugger and Alex Mauer. The size of the circles are proportional to the coverage in the city, so small circles represent poor coverage and large circles good coverage.
Alex Mauer's original assessment concluded that OSM is slightly ahead of Google/TeleAtlas worldwide, and specifically in Africa and Asia. OSM is significantly ahead in Europe, whereas Google is somewhat ahead in Oceania, and significantly ahead in the Americas, especially South America.
There is a great overview of OpenStreetMap, mapping parties and the technologies used to create OSM maps on Slideshare.
There is a great overview of OpenStreetMap, mapping parties and the technologies used to create OSM maps on Slideshare.
Comments